Click Here For The Wall Street Journal Shop at Zappos.com Netflix, Inc. J&R Computer/Music World Paragon Sports J&R Computer/Music World Hot Offers Netflix, Inc.
The New Moneyball
LOVEMYTEAM.COM Fan Friendly Awards Fan Survey Online Poll Message Board - Talk it over
Johanna's View
by Johanna Wagner
The New Moneyball
This post was written by Johanna Wagner on December 24, 2009
Posted Under: Johanna's View

OK, this piece isn’t really about Money ball, just about the A’s.  But, isn’t in interesting that the team that is most closely associated with the term “money ball” and veered away from non-productive outs, such as the failed stolen base, now seems to be building a team that can steal bases?

Since the steroid era ended, or at least since testing has begun, few teams are being built to just simply out-hit their opponent. (The Rangers may be the exception.)  Few team can be built that way really.  Baseball is returning to that old axiom of pitching and defense.  And ’small ball’ is coming into fashion again.  The A’s are right smack dab in the middle of that trend too.  Here is a quick link to the Susan Slusser piece about the signing of Coco Crisp by the A’s.  Here is a quote from the piece from GM Billy Beane, where he all but outright says “I love the stolen base”:

“When you’ve got speed guys at first base and second base, it changes the whole dynamic of the game,” Crisp said. “You get into the pitcher’s head, the catcher’s head, the manager’s, they have to change defensive schemes, move outfielders in. With our legs, we can definitely put pressure on opponents.”

Stealing bases isn’t the most non-productive out around.  Still, the A’s have rarely been the team to even try to steal bases. Of course, with their teams of the past, they didn’t exactly have players that could consistently steal.  Now though, the story is changing. And in the AL West, Beane could be right. It will be a game about getting into a young pitcher’s head.   Only time will tell if this is going to work for them, or even if they have the right pieces to move a new philosophy into the game.  Do they have the manager for that?  I don’t know.  But this shift certainly brings up a lot of questions.
Moneyball has always really meant finding the undervalued players available and building a team around them. If everyone is heading towards pitching and defense though, could finding some good fielding fast guys really be finding the undervalued?  Billy Beane is a master of figuring out new ways to win.  The stolen base might be his key now.
Anyone think the sacrifice bunt can’t be far behind?
Bookmark and Share

Reader Comments

I love small ball…. I’m glad it’s coming back…. much more interesting game…. now if we could just get the AL to abandon that DH horse crap….

#1 
Written By John Wiatrak on December 24th, 2009 @ 10:45 am

Isn’t that a quote from Coco Crisp?? Beane didn’t say anything about the stolen base.

#2 
Written By John on December 24th, 2009 @ 6:57 pm

It is… I am not sure now if I just read it wrong, or if I meant to use another quote. Here though is another quote from Susan Slusser’s blog:

So… is that the new plan? Run past the opposition? If Matt Holliday can’t hit the ball out at the Coliseum, no one can, so now the A’s are all speed, no power?

I think it could be pretty fun to watch, especially after so many years of slow, station-to-station teams. But I also think the A’s will add some power before the season starts, and I think that there’s a good chance it will be Jack Cust again.

Read more: http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/blogs/athletics/indexn?blogid=21#ixzz0ao18JpK2

So I am not the only one thinking that station to station ball is over in Oakland

#3 
Written By Johanna Wagner on December 26th, 2009 @ 9:41 am

Thanks for pointing out my error by the way. It keeps me honest and on my toes, and hopefully makes me a better writer.

#4 
Written By Johanna Wagner on December 26th, 2009 @ 9:41 am

Add a Comment

required, use real name
required, will not be published
optional, your blog address

Next Post: Merry Christmas!